<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitterassment? Twalking? Twiticide? What will the next Twitter vocabulary word be?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techaffect.com/2008/05/23/twitterassment-twalking-twiticide-what-will-the-next-twitter-vocabulary-word-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techaffect.com/2008/05/23/twitterassment-twalking-twiticide-what-will-the-next-twitter-vocabulary-word-be/</link>
	<description>Affect Strategies&#039; PR &#38; Marketing Blog for Technology Companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.techaffect.com/2008/05/23/twitterassment-twalking-twiticide-what-will-the-next-twitter-vocabulary-word-be/comment-page-1/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techaffect.com/2008/05/23/twitterassment-twalking-twiticide-what-will-the-next-twitter-vocabulary-word-be/#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>Great post. Twitter has been on my mind a lot lately, too. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mpdailyfix.com/2008/05/twitter_can_we_talk.html#more&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This post&lt;/a&gt; on MarketingProfs late last week led me to the realization that the folks behind Twitter don&#039;t see the site as a community but rather a pure technology play. Biz&#039;s comment you quote above definitely backs that up. I&#039;m not sure I agree with their strategy, but at least we know where they stand. 

What also strikes me is how &quot;1.0&quot; they are about communicating with their users, openness, transparency, etc. They should have their Web 2.0 membership privileges revoked ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Twitter has been on my mind a lot lately, too. <a href="http://www.mpdailyfix.com/2008/05/twitter_can_we_talk.html#more" rel="nofollow">This post</a> on MarketingProfs late last week led me to the realization that the folks behind Twitter don&#8217;t see the site as a community but rather a pure technology play. Biz&#8217;s comment you quote above definitely backs that up. I&#8217;m not sure I agree with their strategy, but at least we know where they stand. </p>
<p>What also strikes me is how &#8220;1.0&#8243; they are about communicating with their users, openness, transparency, etc. They should have their Web 2.0 membership privileges revoked <img src='http://www.techaffect.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

